Riding Along with the DPD
I was fortunate to have the opportunity to ride along with a DPD patrol from 6-11 pm Saturday. I would like to thank Chief Bladel for extending the invitation and I would like to thank Officer Harris for allowing me to ride along in his squad car.
The patrol beat, last night, had nine cars in the city; eight on assigned beats and one that had more of a "roaming capacity." Officer Harris had the roaming assignment. According to those I spoke with last night was relatively quite (for a July Saturday night), probably due to the storms that passed through and the unseasonably cool weather we had. Nevertheless the officers were busy in all corners of the city.
Most of what we encountered was fairly routine: disorderly folks at a convenience store, a false 911 call, fender bender, a couple neighborhood disturbances, trespassing in a announcer's box at a ball field, and a search for a man that has a warrant for his arrest (stayed in the car for that one). All accounts were handled professionally and efficiently once on the scene. Obviously there is a reason the department is accredited (the Quad Cities’ first and Iowa’s largest law enforcement agency to become accredited) -- they do a great job with what they have to work with.
It is interesting to note, although not surprising, that the majority (well over 50%) of the calls seem to be associated with rental properties; despite the fact that they only make up less than 1/4 of our cumulative population.
It is easy to see how they can become spread thin at times. The search for the warranted individual required three cars and another time (we did not respond to this), during the night, three or so cars responded to a foot chase on Elmore for a shoplifting suspect. Once these situations occur, far fewer cars are on patrol and response times can slow. I know when we started out at 6 pm, Officer Harris had three calls to attend to (all lower priorities), but it is hard to be three places at once and it takes time.
The technology with the computers in the cars is impressive, from the video/audio taping capabilities, to the beat breakdown and instant messaging systems in the computer -- great tools for the officers. The new police station will help make things more efficient and effective and new patrols cars are slated for FY-07.
I do know we have come and will continue to come to crossroads with our budgeting processes. Funding for public safety is expensive and to deliver these high levels of service costs a lot of money. We can take steps (i.e. consolidated dispatch) to free up more dollars and become more efficient, but to put more officers on the street we will have to work hard to make this come into place. It is a delicate balance offering high levels of city services and reasonable tax structures. Hopefully, in future budgets we will be able to help bring more folks on board -- perhaps keying in on NETS, which helps take care of problems more at the ground level in a proactive manner.
I guess I wasn't surprised at the outcome of my ride along, it lined up pretty well with what I have heard from our Chief and Union Board. But, it was nice to see things first hand. Thanks again to DPD.
To learn more about DPD click here.
27 Comments:
It sounds like you're saying Davenport has the largest PD in the state... Is that what you meant? Larger than Des Moines?
To Anon. 11:29,
Not the largest dept. in Iowa, just the largest to become accredited. Sorry for the confusion, I made the change to the post. Thanks.
Davenport needs to go after bad landlords big time and then see the crime rate drop.
What an idiotic statement! Crime has very little to do with landlords good or bad. Just another weak argument used to block projects like PEDCOR.
Ian, I applaud your efforts to get involved and check things out like your ride along with the PD. I wish you would promote yourself more because I think you are doing a good job but no one really knows about it because you don't make a lot of noise. Your special meetings have been informative and I believe you are working hard. Wish you would speak up more though at the committee and council meetings so the public knows your opinion and stand on the issues. Anyway, keep up the good work and thanks for all that you do.
To Anon. 9:48,
Thanks for the comments. I do a lot of my reading and question asking, of staff, prior to the meetings. I try to do my best to prepare in advance.
I have never been long winded and do think there is something said for an effective and efficient meeting process. I realize the open meetings are a forum to state positions and will take your comments under advisement as we move forward.
Thanks again, Ian
When landlords keep their properties substandard, and rent to people whom they do not screen, then he/she has created a bredding ground for crime. Properties that a kept slummy and in dilapitated conditions, cannot attract decent tenants, so the lanldords have to rent to as Dan Lubell says, "the best of the worst". This means, criminals and other people who cannot rent at an upstanding rental unit. Even worse, some landlords frankky could care less who they rent to and don't even look into anyone rental background or criminal background. In the central city and elsewhere, we have many many landlords who do not like near the properties and do not care who they rent to. They help create bad neighborhoods by being bad property owners. These lanldords drain our resources, ruin or neighborhoods and should be shut down.
Hopefully the city is beginning to take this issue seriously FINALLY.
Maybe someone should consider PEDCOR and the group doing the Horizon Homes project, I think it some developer out of Des Moines. Warehousing low income people is asking for problems, what is missing is education. Ask any recent high school graduate that you know, did they learn about balancing a checkbook, about credit, about personal finances of any kind? Chances are the answer is no, and I agree these lesson should come from our parents, but we all know in a majority of the cases they don't.
Just when I commented that you were doing a good job, then you pull something despicable like you did tonight. You walked away from your responsibility to the citizens and refused to take the appropriate actions to deal with a thief. You are a coward and this will forever remain on your public record.
To Anon. 10:44,
Given the seriousness of the allegations brought forward, against our administrator, it is my belief that the full council and mayor should be available to meet in an executive session.
If the council meeting would have taken place, the full council and mayor would not have been available in the session due to the fact that our mayor and one alderman was out of town today. Our Mayor requested that a quorum not be present and I left shortly before the meeting started.
It is an unfortunate situation.
Please remember, there is more to the story, and it will be flushed out in a future executive session.
These are my comments at this juncture, thanks. Ian
Ian, why no public statement by anyone saying the regularly scheduled council meeting was cancelled? Just hiding and leaving your colleagues sitting there reeks of scandal and something to hide.
To Anon. 11:13,
Thanks for the post. This is a delicate matter and there is nothing to hide. All the documentation is in place and will be sorted out in the future. I am not going to comment on the details at this point, but am confident it will be worked through in the coming week(s).
This shows that being bought and paid for comes before public duty.
You have already lost the firemen. Now another nail in the coffin of your career.
DWB
To DWB 6:59,
Feel free to call me (508-2842)to discuss your issues. I'd be happy to visit with you. Thanks, Ian
I do not understand why the full regularly scheduled public meeting was cancelled because a minority of councilmen did not want to deal with or table one item at the end -- to be held as a closed session by the way. Please explain this on your site. Please do not ask me to call you. The public needs to listen to your response, not just me. Thank you.
To Anon. 11:09,
Thanks for the post. I am happy to provide a response:
Once an official meeting commences, all agenda items need to be addressed. The items, on the agenda, pass, fail, or are tabled.
The executive session to analyze Mr. Malin's contract was one such item on the agenda. I believe, given the seriousness of the allegations, that all council members and the mayor should have been present (also, this was a request of the Mayor and Vice Mayor).
I would have liked to seen this item tabled for two reasons:
1. Because this first came to fruition on Monday and in fairness to Mr. Malin he should be given more time to prepare a response to the disputed items.
2. I think the mayor and all alderman should have been present.
In my opinion, the proper levels of communication did not exist between all parties involved. I was quite unsure if a tabled motion would have passed.
I regret leaving the meeting and apologize to the citizens for this. It is my understanding that a special meeting, to address "standard agenda items" will take place Monday.
I am disappointed for what has transpired. I realize this does not cast the city in a favorable light. I believe, moving forward, stronger lines of communication need to exist and a higher level of trust needs to be established between all members of the council and staff (myself included).
I assume another executive session will be scheduled next week. At this point, the matter will continue to be investigated.
Please feel free to contact me with any additional concerns.
Thanks, Ian
I appreciate your comments on the Malin contact. Due to the delictae matter of the situation - my last post will be my final response, on this issue, until some sort of resolution comes forward.
Please feel free to post on other issues in the interim. Thanks, Ian
Ian:
YOur political future is in jeodary of you take Haowrd's and Brooke's advice.
You should have stayed to get the matter tabled not run out with the others. It was the irresponsible thing to do and makes you and the others look very bad.
This is something you need to think about - it was a bad move on your part and I like you so I am offering this advice to you.
There was an entire agenda on tap. The clowns came for Gosh sakes. This move makes you and the others look bad. What is do disappointing is that you weren't tainted like the others, so this did you some big damage. may have cost you your poltical career. I suggest you publicly state you should not have walked out and take responsibilty.
To 9:59 AM
Read Ian's responce again.... "I was quite unsure if a tabled motion would have passed."
With the fab 5 wanting Malins head, they would have voted NOT to table and tableing would have failed.
Ian, I think you did the smart thing. They were tring to railroad Malin.
Railroad a thief? How is that possible?
48 hours passed between Monday's COW and the council meeting to remove the item from the agenda if that was what the council decided should happen. You can't really expect the public to believe the walkout was a last minute decision based on a phone call with the Mayor. Those who walked out embarrassed the entire council, and showed great disrespect for the public, their agenda, and their time. Mr. Malin also had plenty of time to get ready for discussion at an Executive Decision. He already knew his position and was ready to speak in his defense. The man has no doubt about his position. See how quickly he penned a press release. When there is suspected improper behavior, especially involving serious matters (and you say this is serious) like misappropriations of funds, you act quickly -- you do not give the person in question more time. Remember that. Put him on some kind of supervised leave, and get this resolved on Monday.
Ian:
YOu have to do better then this if you want to save your reputation. I heard that Howard convinced you all to leave by telling you that Malin was to be arrested. I tell you now Ian, stop listening to Howard. She is over and you need to be a leader, not a follower. Please listen here and do the right thing.
It isn't fair to this city and to other employees that have been accused of crimes. You can't allow Malin to be treated differently then others. Loos did nothing wrong and Malin placed him on leave. You need to place Malin on leave.
Be a leader Ian, remember. You will not be trusted for the rest of you time unless you stand up and do the right thing.
Ian, this seems too important to put off until Thursday. Why no immediate attention to make a decision?
To Anon. 7:57,
Ald. Ambrose is out of town through Wed. Thursday will be the first day, since the initial questions surfaced, that the entire council (all alderman) and mayor will be available to meet.
Ian:
YOu shoudl call for Malin's resignation or atleast a full investigation into this matter. That is the right thing to do. For the people you represent and for your political career. Bad karma comes around 10 fold. Remember that.
FYI
Statement, re: City Admin. Contract
http://www.ianfrink.com/contractcm.html
To 7:16 Anonymous blogger, the cursing of another only comes back to harm those who wish it. How sad that such a crass statement would be voiced. May you have a happy life and let us be grateful for Alderman Frink....10 times over!
He is a half glass full person with a love for his community! Just talking with him makes that evident. I don't agree with his position on Mr. Malin but he is honest and shared his opinion openly.
Post a Comment
<< Home