Monday, June 05, 2006

The "Historic Shopping District" in the Village



Seeing the "Historic Shopping District" designation move toward official council approval has been satisfying throughout the course of the past week. I am hopeful this will pass through the final stages of our voting and come to fruition. The purpose is to "preserve and enhance the small scale or historic character of certain older commercial neighborhoods." The initial target has been the East Village, but the HSD designation could be implemented anywhere throughout the city. City staff has worked hard over the past few months with Village businesses, and ward alderman Bill Lynn (5th) and Charlie Brooke (6th) for a total team effort.

The Village is alive and well. This designation could help build the next layer upon its' foundation. Just Monday night, I walked through the park and noticed - about 75 folks at the softball field, 20 on the basketball courts, cars parked all up and down 11th St., and some busy staffers at a campaign office. I'd guess, at least, 200 people enjoying the Village on a Monday night. All the ingredients for success are here: a beautiful park (Lindsay), scenic views of the Mississippi, and a collection of buildings dating back to the late 1800's. The business offer a wide variety of options: from day spas, bars/restaurants, art galleries, a candy/ice cream parlor, professional offices, a coffee shop, a financial services office, bank, dance studio, a water taxi stop, and more. Over 90 businesses call the Village home. The Village also plays host to art fairs, car/tractor shows, Civil War re-enactments, and a Christmas festival.

Granted the HSD designation did grow out of controversial new use to Turner Hall, but, in my opinion, this is the right direction to head for the long term stability of this neighborhood - one of the unique historic shopping neighborhoods left in the city. Perhaps this will open the door to new small and historic districts in other corners of our city.

The protest rate for the re-zoning and designation was a mere 0.6%. Obviously, this is something the folks in the surrounding residential neighborhoods support.

The Village was founded in 1851 as a pre Civil War logging town. Five years later the first railroad bridge across the Mississippi was built just south of here. The Village was the site of Camp McClellan in the 1860's, holding training grounds and prisoners from numerous conflicts. Over time the commercial businesses became established and residential areas grew around the area in the early 1900's. Businesses have come and gone, but the buildings have been preserved and in 1980, the Village was named to the National Registry of Historic Places.

The area has a great deal of potential to take the next step. Many businesses have started by re-modeling and preserving the historic nature of the area. The city has moved forward with improvements on the Eastern Gateway of River Drive.

This is a true part of our history. I'm supportive of new developments in other areas of Davenport, but the Village is unique and is a special place for many. My only wish is that this would have been done sooner, before some of the mass demolitions we had in years prior in other parts of town.

Galena has done well to establish their older parts of town; perhaps we will be able to ramp up closer to what they have to offer in the Village. After living out East for a number of years, I was impressed by the extra emphasis to preserve history. Areas like the Village have character and charm. This is a step in the right direction; hopefully we will be able to identify more HSD's in Davenport as time moves forward.

What are your thoughts for other potential HSD's in the city or improvements to the Village or Lindsay Park? Do you have any pros or cons for the new HSD designation?

More info, on the Village, is online at: http://www.villageofeastdavenport.com.

11 Comments:

At 9:32 PM, Blogger QuadCityImages said...

Would all this hoopla have started if the proposed bar was a country line dance bar? If the answer is no, then there is something wrong.

 
At 9:52 PM, Blogger Ian Frink said...

Thanks for the post. The Village has been fairly organized for a number of years. I think, eventually, something like the HSD would have come about.

The prospect of a large scale "club" did, no doubt, expedite the process. Bottom line - I don't think the Village has the capacity to handle another 200+ folks out and about on a Friday/Saturday night. Last night, a Monday, had the main parking lot on River 2/3 full and 11th St. full of parking.

 
At 10:48 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Of all the businesses you mention in your post Alderman Frink, few are operating as shopping establishments during the hours the Turner Club would be used. Turner Club would be a nighttime establishment. Maybe there isn't enough parking to add the new proposed business; and maybe the HSD would benefit the Village overall, but to slam the new designation through as a means to keep out the club smacks of heavy handed politics and special interests from city hall. Keep the club out if there really isn't enough parking, or the owners track record warrants withholding permits. But don't use shopping as the reason when little if any shopping is conducted at night.

 
At 6:23 AM, Blogger QuadCityImages said...

Where was this concern for parking when Stadium Club decided to add a 3rd bar to an area with practically no parking at all at 29th and Brady?

 
At 12:06 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Maybe we should put some sort of parking restrictions on St. Ambrose University. If they have x number of students they have to provide a certain number of on campus parking spaces, this would probably alleviate all the problems with the students using the residents parking.

 
At 10:40 PM, Blogger Ian Frink said...

Thanks for the posts.

I realize the neighborhood in and round the Stadium Club has parking difficulties, but I think the challenges in the Village are more significant.

The neighborhoods, around SAU, do have some parking restrictions in place at this juncture. I agree challenges do exist for a land locked university such as SAU and its' neighbors, especially as they continues to grow. It is my hope that the council continue striving towards compromise in these areas in the future.

The HSD designation passed, on all three readings, at tonight's formal council meeting.

 
At 9:53 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

If I recall, the city didn't pass the liquor license of the stadium club because of public safety issues. The owners appeal to the State and they over ruled the city.

I could be wrong, but I don't think so.

 
At 10:42 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

to 10:40 PM You call that a response?

 
At 10:58 PM, Blogger Ian Frink said...

To Anon. 10:42,

Thanks for the post. If you would like to inquire further, about specifics I am available via email at ian@ianfrink.com or via cell phone at 563.508.2842.

 
At 1:54 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Other than limiting the amount of space dedicated to taverns an area can have with this HSD designation, what else does the designation do? I'm just trying to understand how this designation will fulfill its purpose of "preserving and enhancing historic neighborhoods".

 
At 9:53 PM, Blogger Ian Frink said...

To Anon. 1:54,

Thanks for the post. We received eight pages of language for this particular ordinance and a number of supporting documents.

I have tried to pull some specific examples/highlights from the document.

The HSD designation allows for:

- Buildings/lots shall be only used for the following purposes: antique shop, art gallery, bakery, B&B's, inns, professional office, day care, floral, deli, gourmet food store, restaurant, artist studios, and many more. Plus "other similar and compatible uses as accessory buildings, structures, and uses customarily incidental to above uses."

- Protection for incompatible development - some examples listed include: radio/television/phone towers, dancing establishments, adult entertainment, pawn shop, public garage, day loan/check cashing entity, and many more.

- Maintenance of a "critical mass" of retail uses. The ordinance shall restrict the percentage of any block face or block length the can be taverns, bars, brew pubs, beer/wine gardens, or similar - to no more than 35%.

- Height, yard, lot width, and area regulations. As well as, infill development design, scale, and materials.

- Parking regulations, a design review committee, and more.

I am more than happy to provide the complete eight-page document to anyone who sends me his or her email address or street address. Let me know by contacting me: ian@ianfrink.com.

 

Post a Comment

<< Home